Dear Derik, thank you, that's the solution.
Mirko -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:59:20 +0200 > Von: Derek Holzer <[email protected]> > An: Mirko Maier <[email protected]> > CC: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [PD] limiter questions > But this one does. Working in RMS values appears to be the solution to > your problem. > > D. > > Mirko Maier wrote: > > Thank you, but it definitely doesn't limit the signal! > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > >> Datum: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:16:17 +0200 > >> Von: Derek Holzer <[email protected]> > >> An: Mirko Maier <[email protected]> > >> CC: [email protected] > >> Betreff: Re: [PD] limiter questions > > > >> You may want to investigate the relationship between dB and RMS > further. > >> Attached is a working patch, however very crudely. Have a look at the > >> numbers given by the [dbtorms] and [rmstodb] objects. Note use of > >> [line~] as well. > > -- > ::: derek holzer ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista ::: > http://www.vimeo.com/macumbista ::: > ---Oblique Strategy # 83: > "How would someone else do it?" -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
