Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:

> I've been using this a lot recently as well, but I don't think, Miller's
> undocumented suggestion can replace this in all cases. One advantage of the
> bang~->switch~ approach is - I believe - that it gets rid of many function

I meant to write "[bang~]->[0(->[switch~]" here. 

Ciao
-- 
Frank

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to