I should have also added that I'm only using this functionality for relatively small arrays (500 values), and haven't tried using it for arrays which may be holding longish audio samples.
-Stephen On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Stephen Lucas <s9lu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just putting in my 2cents, but I've been using the bonus feature of being > able to write an array's contents to a text file with a message and then > read it back out to a different array with another message. > > This is probably ok for my usage, since I have a project where I need > to store *lots* of arrays in text files anway, but it's certainly a really > easy solution in terms of code. > > -Stephen > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Frank Barknecht <f...@footils.org>wrote: > >> Hallo, >> Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote: >> >> > I've been using this a lot recently as well, but I don't think, Miller's >> > undocumented suggestion can replace this in all cases. One advantage of >> the >> > bang~->switch~ approach is - I believe - that it gets rid of many >> function >> >> I meant to write "[bang~]->[0(->[switch~]" here. >> >> Ciao >> -- >> Frank >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list