I modified IOhannes' patch to use pix_write instead of
pix_snap+pix_write and it also crashes, so it is not a difference
between pix_write and pix_writer: both crash.
I'll have a look at what's different between IOhannes' and Jack's
patches that may explain why one crashes and the other does not....
Matteo Sisti Sette escribió:
IOhannes m zmoelnig escribió:
Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
Ok, IOhannes' patch seems to be what I was looking for, however I have
the following problems:
- The patch out-of-the-box saves unreadable tiffs just like Jack's
which OS?
Windows Vista :(
- By sending it a [file something 95( to pix_writer in order to have
jpegs saved instead of tiffs, which DOES work with [pix_write], pd
crashes!!!!!
it's really the same object as [pix_write], just without the snap-code.
Then the strange thing is that Jack's patch with pix_write does not
crash when saving jpegs (it saves black images but i guess it might be
some trivial error in the patch) while your patch with pix_writer
does.... How may I avoid the crash???
It does not crash when I send the [file ...( message but when I try to
save the first snapshot after it.
Where can I find some documentation more detailed than the help patches
in order to understand the mechanisms? I get quite lost when trying to
understand how your patch (for example) works. I more or less understand
the notion of gem chain, gem list, and, for example, separators, but I
still get lost when [gemframebuffer] enters the scene, I don't even
fully understand why it is needed at all in your patch, for example......
Thanks again and again
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
[email protected]
http://www.matteosistisette.com
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
