--- On Wed, 12/2/09, cyrille henry <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: cyrille henry <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD] Very large patches unstable? > To: "Mathieu Bouchard" <[email protected]> > Cc: "PD-List" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 9:36 PM > > > Mathieu Bouchard a écrit : > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, cyrille henry wrote: > > > >> i made some patch that use 98454 abstractions. it > certainly is very long to load, and almost impossible to > save. > > > > What can make any patch longer to save than to load? > I'd like to know. Normally, using abstractions makes it much > longer to load a patch than to save it. > > in the patch i made that use so many abstraction, i have : > abstraction_1 that have about 10 abstraction_2 inside. > abstraction_2 use about 10 abstraction_3 > ... > abstraction_5 use about 10 abstraction_6 > > if you save abstraction_2, then pd will have to reload all > abstraction_2 > > this is lot's longer than loading the patch. > > anyway, in order to reload abstractions, pd have to remove > the old and create a new. this is longer than only create a > new. But saving the parent patch that holds all of these abstractions should take very little time. I thought that's what you were talking about. -Jonathan > > Cyrille > > > > > _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ > _____________________ ... > > | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: > +1.514.383.3801 > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] > mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
