On Dec 26, 2009, at 1:29 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Quoting "cyrille henry" <[email protected]>:
[email protected] a écrit :
...
should be fairly simple to write an abstraction that wraps
vanilla's [wrap] into the zexy version.
wrap is problematic, because if you use the zexy version, and then
use your patch on an other computer without zexy : you will not
have any warning and your patch may not work.
i know,l but i cannot do anything short of rolling back the time.
usually, you have an error because of missing object...
i would suggest that the vanilla [wrap] should refuse to create (or
at least throw a serious warning) when it is invoked with arguments.
or even better: the vanilla wrap would just clone the behaviour of
zexy's wrap.
while the code for it is right now GPL, i would consider dual-
licensing it under BSD in order to get it into vanilla :-)
zexy's [wrap] gets it wrong by having only two inlets and using a list
to set the min/max. [wrap] is very similar to [clip], so it should
have the same interface for the args and inlets. zexy's [wrap] has
the same arg structure, but not the same inlet structure. See my
other email for a complete proposal, [wrap], zexy vs. vanilla.
.hc
fgamsdr
IOhannes
fgmar
IOhannes
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
<mime-attachment>_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
