No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is really no way not to save table data in Pd-extended.
Roman On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 12:20 -0800, Jaime Oliver wrote: > in array you can click or unclick save contents. is that what you are > talking about? > > J > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I just realized, that my little patch posted previously is ~40kB heavy. > > Sorry for filling your mail boxes with zeros. > > > > Unlike Pd-vanilla, Pd-extended seems to save the content of a [table] object > > in the .pd-file. Why was that changed? Is there any way to have the content > > _not_ saved with the patch? If someone deliberately wants to save this data > > still an array can be used. > > > > Roman _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
