Am 22.01.10 11:29 schrieb "Frank Barknecht" unter <[email protected]>:
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
>> No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in
>> Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case
>> on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is really no way not to save table
>> data in Pd-extended.
>
> It wasn't the table content, that was saved in your patch, it was the message
> box
> that you use to achieve the speed-up. It was still filled when you've saved
> the patch. :)
Thanks for clearing that up. And sorry for the noise.
> Anyway I think, even when dynamically changing message boxes has the danger
> of being fooled by this kind of side effects, the optimization results are
> often worth
> it. I've added the attached version of [list-tabdump] to the Sourceforge SVN
> now.
Cool. Thanks
Roman
___________________________________________________________
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
