--- On Thu, 4/15/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd? > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 5:53 PM > > >> Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit : > >>> Frank wrote: > >>> > It's not so much the tool, as it is the > skills that makes music > >>> > sound good. > >>> That is true for really good tools. Needless > to say that Pd is one of > >>> them. > > sorry, I might going to be rude, > > but I've never heard some music completely made with > PureData that really sound good. > > they are alway little experiments, or false reproductions > of things we know and without the sound. > > like last time someone posted something that sounded like > 'psychic warriors of gaia', but honnestly i'd prefer the > original. > > The skill to make music with pd is about rewriting > everything, at the end it's not really the skill of a > musician, > > for example in concrete music, who is the musician, Pierre > Schaeffer, or Pierre Henry? > > Pierre Schaeffer has demonstrated that he is a very > skilled music scientist, but he didn't even made a shit that > we could hear like a composition. > > pd is just a tool for learning dsp, there is no such > project that show how pd is cool to make people moving on > the dance floor. In your opinion, what kinds of features would the hypothetical "cool pd" have in order to give a composer the tools to make people move on the dance floor? -Jonathan _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
