--- On Thu, 4/15/10, Phil Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Phil Stone <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd? > To: "PD list" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 7:49 PM > In addition to disagreeing vehemently > with your main point (Pd is good for little more than > experimentation), I find this a piss-poor acid test for > "music that sounds good": > > [email protected] > wrote: > > there is no such project that show how pd is cool to > make people moving on the dance floor. > > Phil- I dig music with compelling sounds, and I generally feel the urge to move my body to music I dig. One can use whatever test one wants to hold up some music as "genuine," and the question "does it draw people out onto the dance floor?" is just as valid as any other in this regard. But then if the point of the acid test is to demonstrate the strengths of a visual programming paradigm for the rapid implementation of various dsp techniques to generate music, I'd say the OP's test is quite a fitting and effective "Hello World" for Pd. -Jonathan > > > Phil Stone > www.pkstonemusic.com > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
