It says grub 0.97-29ubuntu60 (Legacy version) grub-common 1.98-1ubuntu6 Afaik Ubuntu Studio is a whole lotta different dependency tree.
Andras 2010/7/1 Pedro Lopes <[email protected]> > Nop, from karmic (9.10) up its grub2, the thing its a bit odd but > 1.97~beta4 is actually grub2[1]. Or a more trusted source [2] - see that it > reads grub2 bellow: > > > grub2 (1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4)) > > > [1] > http://movingtowardslinux.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/installing-windows-and-linuxes-together-dual-boot/ > > [2] > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4<https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.97%7Ebeta4-1ubuntu4> > > 2010/6/30 András Murányi <[email protected]> > >> Thanks all! >> >> I'm with (stupid:) Ubuntu, vanilla... so my kernel is not rt by default, i >> suppose. >> Will take a look at this patching thing... (before i thought it's the >> source you have to patch...) >> >> As for grub, it seems grub2 comes with a fresh Lucid install but my old >> grub just survived the upgrade (bet i'm glad) >> >> Andras >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Pedro Lopes <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Easier than messing with grub2 new commands... >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Kim Cascone <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> also, if you want a quick and easy way to switch kernels for testing: >>>> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/StartUpManager >>>> >>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
