Its not a "hack" its the old way. He'll advise you not to edit the file, but I always do that... i'm to lazy to do it the new way... one day..one day..
2010/7/1 András Murányi <[email protected]> > 2010/7/1 Pedro Lopes <[email protected]> > >> No... my grub is from the normal karmic. Did you had another ubuntu >> installed previous? The thing is, when you install any ubuntu from karmic >> up, it asks if you wish to upgrade to the new grub.. you can always say no. >> > > Yes, i've been upgrading this since Hardy. I don't remember being asked, it > just stayed "legacy". > > Although your "grub-common 1.98-1ubuntu6" is already grub2 :) see [1] >> The major diff is that in grub 2 there's a whole new way of editing the >> entries, although you can sill do it the old way by editing the grub.cfg >> file, they do not recommend - but its doable. >> > > Yes i already witnessed grub2 in its full weirdness on another computer... > but i didn't now about this hack :) > > Andras > > >> >> [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.98-1ubuntu6 >> >> 2010/6/30 András Murányi <[email protected]> >> >>> It says >>> grub 0.97-29ubuntu60 (Legacy version) >>> grub-common 1.98-1ubuntu6 >>> Afaik Ubuntu Studio is a whole lotta different dependency tree. >>> >>> Andras >>> >>> 2010/7/1 Pedro Lopes <[email protected]> >>> >>> Nop, from karmic (9.10) up its grub2, the thing its a bit odd but >>>> 1.97~beta4 is actually grub2[1]. Or a more trusted source [2] - see that >>>> it >>>> reads grub2 bellow: >>>> >>>> >>>> grub2 (1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4)) >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://movingtowardslinux.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/installing-windows-and-linuxes-together-dual-boot/ >>>> >>>> [2] >>>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4<https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.97%7Ebeta4-1ubuntu4> >>>> >>>> 2010/6/30 András Murányi <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Thanks all! >>>>> >>>>> I'm with (stupid:) Ubuntu, vanilla... so my kernel is not rt by >>>>> default, i suppose. >>>>> Will take a look at this patching thing... (before i thought it's the >>>>> source you have to patch...) >>>>> >>>>> As for grub, it seems grub2 comes with a fresh Lucid install but my old >>>>> grub just survived the upgrade (bet i'm glad) >>>>> >>>>> Andras >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Pedro Lopes >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Easier than messing with grub2 new commands... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Kim Cascone >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> also, if you want a quick and easy way to switch kernels for testing: >>>>>>> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/StartUpManager >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Pedro Lopes >> contacto: [email protected] >> website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes >> > > > > -- > Muranyi Andras > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- Pedro Lopes contacto: [email protected] website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
