Hi Derek, that's it !!! I just subtracted 0.5 from the [phasor~] outlet and now it behaves as expected. Thank you!
Now I have to find all the [phasor~] objects in my patches und change it there. Using [blosc~] is just too expensive for simply producing some slight "dirt" modulations. Ingo > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Derek > Holzer > Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. November 2010 14:49 > An: pd-list@iem.at > Betreff: Re: [PD] Strange behavior between [phasor~] and [creb/blosc~] > > Did you try graphing the output of the combined [phasor~] objects? To > me, it seems likely that the lack of a zero-crossing in the [phasor~] > waveform would create a large amount of DC offset, and perhaps that is > what you are hearing. [creb/blosc~], [osc~] and pretty much any other > audio waveform generator all have mostly equal amounts of positive and > negative energy in their waveforms. Only [phasor~] is the weird > exception and wasn't even designed to be used as signal source anyways. > I'm quite sure it was mainly intended for use in driving [tabread~] objects. > > D. > > On 11/23/10 2:40 PM, Ingo wrote: > > > Do subpatches with several [phasor~] used as a audiosignals produce a > > different result as intended without summing up in total over "1". > > -- > ::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net ::: > ---Oblique Strategy # 113: > "Make a blank valuable by putting it in an exquisite frame" > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list