Have a look here:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/PureData/DCOffset
My basic formula is
[*~ 2]
|
[-~ 1]
Best!
D.
On 11/23/10 3:18 PM, Ingo wrote:
Hi Derek,
that's it !!! I just subtracted 0.5 from the [phasor~] outlet and now it
behaves as expected. Thank you!
Now I have to find all the [phasor~] objects in my patches und change it
there. Using [blosc~] is just too expensive for simply producing some slight
"dirt" modulations.
Ingo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von
Derek
Holzer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. November 2010 14:49
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [PD] Strange behavior between [phasor~] and [creb/blosc~]
Did you try graphing the output of the combined [phasor~] objects? To
me, it seems likely that the lack of a zero-crossing in the [phasor~]
waveform would create a large amount of DC offset, and perhaps that is
what you are hearing. [creb/blosc~], [osc~] and pretty much any other
audio waveform generator all have mostly equal amounts of positive and
negative energy in their waveforms. Only [phasor~] is the weird
exception and wasn't even designed to be used as signal source anyways.
I'm quite sure it was mainly intended for use in driving [tabread~]
objects.
D.
On 11/23/10 2:40 PM, Ingo wrote:
Do subpatches with several [phasor~] used as a audiosignals produce a
different result as intended without summing up in total over "1".
--
::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net :::
---Oblique Strategy # 113:
"Make a blank valuable by putting it in an exquisite frame"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net :::
---Oblique Strategy # 101:
"It is simply a matter of work"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
