removing pdp/pidip is a bad idea
On 11/23/2010 11:58 AM, John Harrison wrote:
Yves:
It's your code so you get to choose. From my standpoint as an
educator, removal of PiDiP from pd-extended is very unfortunate. I
hope at some point you reconsider your position.
-John
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:46 AM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
good!!! i'm free to do what i like now!!!
yeh!
sevy
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, will do. I also have to remove pidip from Pd-extended
based on this license.
.hc
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:18 AM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
jooo, que espeso ...
i told you 10000 times not to package my stuff,
that i'm happy with the packages of goto10...
so [EOC]
ciao,
sevy
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Lluis and Yves,
I see that puredyne has packaged pidip, so it should
be pretty easy to get it into Debian. The only problem
is the license. If it was a straight BSD or GPL
license, then it would be fine. The problem is this line:
NOT FOR MILITARY OR REPRESSIVE USE !!!
That isn't free according to the Debian Free Software
Guidelines.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of
others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve
others by any invention of ours; and this we should do
freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programs should be written for people to read, and only
incidentally for machines to execute.
- from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
_______________________________________________
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
