On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, tim vets wrote:

"If you have to play a very large file in RAM, you can do it by emptying your signal-rate counter into a message-rate counter that takes care of the big digits while the signal-rate counter keeps on taking care of the small digits and fractions. (do you want an example ?) "
which afaict he didn't give an example for yet.
I'm not sure what he meant, but that was what I made up of it...probably wrong 
:)

Done...

The idea is that if you want very precise [tabread4~] on large sounds, you have to do the lookup relatively to a recently looked-up point, so, at every block boundary, the newest point becomes the new reference point, such that the signal-rate read-head stays in low values (high precision), whereas the message-rate read-head does all the large motion. That way, you can get up to twice the number of precision bits (but usually less than that).

 _______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to