On 2010-11-29 14:45, tim vets wrote: > do I interpret it correct if I assume that a solution for [tabread~]-ing big > files without quality loss would be to make a counter and split one big > [line~] movement into small segments ? > > something like: > > [metro 100] > | > [f]X[+ 4410] > | > [s adder] > > and > > [r adder] > | > [t b f] > | | > [0, 4410 100( | > | / > [line~] / > | ______ / > [+~]
??? you are still hitting the problem that the output of [+~] has probably to little precision. your patch will thus not give you any benefit. > | > [tabread~] i was _not_ talking about [tabread~] but about [tabplay~] [bang( | [tabplay~] alternatively you can use the send inlet (message!) of [tabread4~] for better precision. the help-patch directs you to B15.tabread4~-onset.pd msdfrt# IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
