Cyrille I just tried your solution and the problem is that all objects sharing the name of the dynamically-created object all get the loadbang message.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Pedro Lopes <[email protected]> wrote: > >yes, this is known. > By known you mean.. Is it on the bug tracker already? > > When such things are discovered (and by things I mean issues), shouldn't > they be documented inside the help patches? > > It helps a lot those getting inside pd. > > Best, > pedro > > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, cyrille henry <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hello, >> >> yes, this is known. >> you have to explicitly send the loadbang, like in this patch, using your >> exemple. >> (don't know about initbang, i don't use it) >> c >> >> >> Le 19/02/2011 20:33, John Harrison a écrit : >> >>> is it correct behavior that loadbang will not be called when it is part >>> of a dynamically created object? See attached. If you load test-do, it will >>> create an instance of test when you click on the message. Test should print >>> loadbang and initbang, but it only prints initbang. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > > > -- > Pedro Lopes (MSc) > contact: [email protected] > website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / > http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | > http://twitter.com/plopesresearch >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
