Le 19/02/2011 20:49, Pedro Lopes a écrit :
>yes, this is known. By known you mean.. Is it on the bug tracker already?
no, it's not considered as a bug.
When such things are discovered (and by things I mean issues), shouldn't they be documented inside the help patches?
dynamic patching is not officially supported. if issues are discovered (and by this i mean bug), they should be post on the bug tracker, to be corrected. c
It helps a lot those getting inside pd. Best, pedro On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, cyrille henry <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: hello, yes, this is known. you have to explicitly send the loadbang, like in this patch, using your exemple. (don't know about initbang, i don't use it) c Le 19/02/2011 20:33, John Harrison a écrit : is it correct behavior that loadbang will not be called when it is part of a dynamically created object? See attached. If you load test-do, it will create an instance of test when you click on the message. Test should print loadbang and initbang, but it only prints initbang. -- John _______________________________________________ [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Pedro Lopes (MSc) contact: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
