On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
checking for PKG_ARTOOLKIT_CFLAGS... checking for PKG_ARTOOLKIT_LIBS... checking for artoolkit-config... no checking for arInitCparam in -lAR... yes checking AR/ar.h usability... yes checking AR/ar.h presence... yes checking for AR/ar.h... yes checking for arInitCparam in -lAR... (cached) yes and then at load-time it still does say : error: [pix_artoolkit]: compiled without ARToolKit support!
Ah, also note that doing "make" after a "./configure" doesn't remake everything, because Makefile is not a dependency.
And currently it seems to be loading the wrong pix_artoolkit, presumably because it was linked directly into another Gem.pd_linux that I'm loading.
I have multiple copies of Gem.pd_linux because it's quite often that 93 (svn head) doesn't work and I have to use 92 or vice-versa. This time I was trying GEM 92's Gem.pd_linux together with GEM 93's pix_artoolkit.pd_linux. I don't remember whether I was using GEM 93's Gem.pd_linux last time... I had to switch it because GEM 93 wouldn't compile last week.
Ok, now with [pix_artoolkit] loading in GEM 93, but can't run it, because I have a weird error message :
error: [pix_video]: do video for this OSwhat does that mean "do video" ? (I think that [pix_video] was working in GEM 93 some weeks ago)
_______________________________________________________________________ | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
