patko,

patko wrote:
hello,

  what is the advantage of using codeblocks for compiling pd and externals?

Why not just using msys like explained in puredata.info tutorial?

To be honest no real advantage/disadvantage, for that project (which various people worked on as I explained in earlier emails) codeblocks was chosen, as the only linux user in the team I pushed for it against visial studio so that at least i could use it as well. Many people (including myself in the past) feel more combfortable with an IDE but of course anyone is free to use whatever they prefer.

Lorenzo
----- "J bz"<jbee...@gmail.com>  a écrit :

Hi peeps,

Wondering if anyone has experience of using Codeblocks to compile an
external for Windows?

Lorenzo Sutton has very kindly forwarded me an external he has made
for quad panning using Chowning's methodology which I really like.
In the package he forwarded to me, he says that all the code is there
for building in windows using codeblocks.

I have had a quick go in Puredyne with it but I require a Windows
version for a piece next week.

I have zero experience of compiling on any platform and don't really
know where to get started. I'm aware there are a couple of tutorials
knocking around on the pd&  hurleur sites but going through them last
night made my teeth hurt. I found a couple of Codeblocks tutorials but
the .dll files I made from them of the external don't work.

I'm sure that if I had a couple of days with nothing else on I could
get to grips with this but I don't. What I do have is a looming
deadline though!

I attach Lorenzo's external (Lorenzo if this is a problem please
contact me asap)

Btw, I have the Codeblocks version with MinGW and the GCC compiler.

Cheers,

Julian


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to