On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:12:49 -0400
Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:21:09 +0800
> > Chris McCormick <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Would you consider adding a more generally useful [split] object
> >
> > I agree this would be a useful core object.
> >
> > What problems, if any, do you forsee?
> >
> > Would those outputs implicitly be symbols? Or would we venture
> > the types in advance like
> >
> > [split f / f]
> >
> > to obtain two floats
> >
> > Turning the symbol 5/7 to a real number
> > would then be
> >
> > [symbol 5/7(
> > |
> > [split f / f]
> > | /
> > [/ ]
> > |
> > [number 0.714285]
>
>
> I think to fit with the Pd type system in general, it should
> automatically interpret things into floats and symbols
> (http://puredata.info/dev/PdDefinitions
> ):
>
> Pd Manual 2.1.2
>
> "The text is divided into atoms separated by white space."
>
> "Atoms are either numbers or symbols like '+'. "
>
> Pd Manual 2.1.2
>
> "Anything that is not a valid number is considered a symbol."
That seems unambiguous. So I guess if you wanted your "numbers" as
symbols, you'd explicitly convert them back to symbols.
I used to use [symbol2list] a lot, so Iohannes suggestion
is interesting. But could that split on an arbitary
symbol like Chris suggests for the proposed [split] ?
a.
--
Andy Farnell <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
