-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-24 07:32, Richie Cyngler wrote: > I don't get why no one is talking about reducing the signal level before > dac~? >
because we are talking about a safety net here. everything done before the [dac~], you can easily circumvent within the patch (consciously or - more likely and dangerous - unconsciously) while happily patching away, making such provisions void (and blasting your ears) fgmasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5UpxsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvS6KgCgpjhEQHwOmHGSv6gCYz4az8ct 2QUAoLneNbeBGpH3ev8XRPZY7ZIUi7oP =NoMB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
