On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:38:32PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Chris McCormick wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 03:59:14PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: >>> You'll have to come up with a more phenomenological approach than picking >>> whatever currently looks the most impredictable thing in the science >>> book. >> >> Why? Randomness is epistemic. > > What does that mean to you ?
Epistemic: Adjective - "Of or relating to knowledge or to the degree of its validation." It means I think that taking whatever currently looks the most impredictable thing in the science book is a good approach. Don't run a lottery with Miller's [noise~] unless you like giving away money. Cheers, Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
