On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:39:37 +0200 Menno van der Woude <[email protected]> wrote:
> So far, [vcf~] has done a great job, thanks! Being able to also change > resonance at sample rate would be nice. At this point, building an > object like that is a bit beyond my level of expertise. IIRC the [moog~] object has audio rate control of all its parameters. > > I am wondering, is there a distortion object around that can be > controlled at sample rate? Both [dist~] and [overdrive~] give many > clicks when real time control moves too fast. Many object combinations can achieve this. [max~] and [min~] provide simple floor and ceiling clips adjustable at audio rate. More sophisticated methods are to use a [*~] scaling before a [tanh~] or [sin~] function, or to index a [tabread4~] containing a transfer you prepared. In this regard have a look at making Chebyshev function tables which have interesting properties when used for distortion. > Browsing the extra folder of pd-extended, I did not come accross other > distortion or similar objects. Which also makes me wonder: is there a > way other than google or browsing the pd files, to find relevant > objects? Yes. 1) Use the help browser by category 2) Use the resources on puredata.info 3) Manually explore the /extra or /extern folder in your pd install 4) ++ more ++ > > Bye, menno > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andy Farnell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes its useful to have signal control over resonance too > > although less common to need it. An example is if you make > > a string or drum skin model with parallel resonances and you > > want to dampen it when it's sounding. > > > > Its been done before using [rpole~] and [rzero~] objects, > > but IIRC was unstable when sweeping the resonance and > > cutoff simultaneously. Filter topologies, with > > the same poles and zeros but in different orders, will behave > > differently when you vary the coefficients, so testing > > with envelopes on both controls should be done. > > > > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:49:14 -0400 (EDT) > > Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> > >> > According to its helpfile, [vcf~ ] is the same as [bp~ ], but with a > >> > voltage controlled aka signal rate inlet for frequency. > >> > >> Now let's say that I want to have all three inlets as signals. > >> > >> Is there an abstraction for doing that ? > >> > >> I just made part of one, by looking at > >> http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node143.html > >> > >> But I'm not done yet. Anyone interested ? > >> > >> _______________________________________________________________________ > >> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC > > > > > > -- > > Andy Farnell <[email protected]> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > -- > --- > Muziek, weblog en zo meer: > www.indelucht.nl > --- > A photo a day keeps the questions away: > www.whatkeepsmegoing.com -- Andy Farnell <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
