-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-18 19:43, Miller Puckette wrote: > I'm with Hans -- e.g., 'list' where there's a whole slew of functionalities > masquerading as a single class (and sharing a help file), but in which > you only need one object for each type of use, e.g., "list nth".
while i'm all for "one objectclass per functionality", and for establishing a single idiom (at least, per "objectclass family") - and thus think i'm with hans also, i still don't see any point in "masquerading as a single class". what makes the name [list foo] any better than [listfoo]? objects with "proper" names - that don't involve "mummmers" - can still share the same help-patch (if needed). mfgasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7KPMgACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSmQQCgxxs7OYZFM7jBAz7TU0/77LUN 6dIAn1qZsIDCZb4Z2bq4bMHS3ZNa5kzC =OXtX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list