Le 2011-12-03 à 14:06:00, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
There are all kinds of crazy people in the world who claim things they
don't have the right to, but to pursue the matter ad absurdum, any
lawsuit over a small typo is going to be thrown out for failing a de
minimis test.
Does that still cost the defendent some money ?
Do you have an anti-SLAPP law yet in your country and/or state, and does
it get applied ? (Where do you live ?)
I must have said something about granting implicit license under the
license of the project when you provide a patch, which is definitely not
the same thing as implicitly giving up copyright.
Oh. I didn't know that you only meant the license.
But there are usually no copyright notices for typo correction. In that
case, if there is a default implicit copyright, this sounds like it would
have to do with the international treaty of 1978... is that right ?
______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
