I don't remember its been about a year or so since I ran it. Was the same thing that was slow with the other slow versions of pd I guess. Next time Ifire up the machine it's on I'll try to run it. I remember that max with juce on windows would drop out with the x.fm patch if I played a bunch of notes.with a 256b block pd would drop out with polyphony as well but I could run with a 64b block and GEM slinging polygons all over the place but the juce examples were slow. With a lot of overhead. I might not have had enough memory 1GB.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]> wrote: > >________________________________ > > From: Billy Stiltner <[email protected]> > >To: Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]> > >Cc: Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]>; "[email protected] List" < > [email protected]> > >Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:03 AM > >Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP > > > > > > > >When I tried JUCE on windows it was slow. pretty but slow. Same with > pdlork on linux. > > What was slow with pd-l2ork? > > -Jonathan > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
