On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 16:47 -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > Le 2012-02-18 à 21:57:00, Roman Haefeli a écrit : > > > An attitude of trying to make things look bad for no obvious reason. > > What Hans has written at the beginning of the announcement is bad and this > is why I « make it look bad ». > > > I think that all recent efforts done in Pd and Pd-extended are great > > The great efforts that Hans puts in the Pd-extended project should not > give him the right to say whatever he wants.
Of course, not. Still, I - according to my personal judgment (I cannot speak for you) - didn't read Hans as he would be claiming unjustified credit. > I'm not even talking about that topic. > > > If people feel pretermitted, I think it's up to them to speak up. > > You mean that it's alright to give the impression that a lot more has > changed in Pd than what really has changed ? No, I agree that giving a misleading impression should be avoided, but the point (again) is that I still believe I didn't get any wrong impression (probably I'm wrong here?). I must also say I haven't looked at the code itself, but followed the commit history of Pd-0.43 and the talks in the mailing lists pd-list and pd-dev. And my impression was that some of what could be changed regarding pd<->pd-gui communication was achieved, but it's still an ongoing process. > Do you think that it helps > making Pd be taken seriously ? Interesting question. I haven't thought about what could help make Pd be taken less or more seriously. Thinking about it, I feel that people often tend to take something seriously for odd reasons, like if has a 'nice' interface, if it costs much, if prominent person XY has a positive opinion about it, etc. Roman _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
