Maybe you could test [edge] Best
José 2012/6/20 tim vets <[email protected]> > > > 2012/6/20 Marian Weger <[email protected]> > >> Am 20.06.12 16:43, schrieb Фывапр Олджэвич: >> >> so the thing with >>> >>> [bang( >>> | >>> [tgl] >>> | >>> [sel 0]_____ >>> | \ >>> [nmbrbox\ [nmbrbox\ >>> >>> propsed by Tim , - is the solution, and I used such a thing, but I >>> thought that the readymade object is more stable - thatswhy i recoded >>> everything with [TogEdge] .. >>> >>> is the [sel]-chain more stable in fast algorithms ? >>> >> >> i don't know [TogEdge], but the "[sel]-chain solution" is completely >> stable. >> replacing externals by built-in functions would also be more future-proof. >> >> perhaps, it would be even more stable if no gui object is involved. >> the toggle could be replaced by a simple counter with modulo. >> >> > don't know if it matters if the tgl isn't visible, > but i guess you could also use: > [i ]X[== 0] > > >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** >> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- http://arselectronicachile.blogspot.com http://comunicacionnativa.blogspot.com/ http://www.myspace.com/santorcuato
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
