Since you are not following the Pd-extended packaging (i.e. Gem from git rather than the pd-extended/0.43 branch), I think it makes more sense if you package each library individually. That is made much easier by the Library Template:
https://puredata.info/docs/developer/LibraryTemplate/ It seems there is already an ArchTemplate there. In Debian, that's how we are packaging things, you can see all the packages listed here, they all start with pd-* http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org .hc On 10/30/2012 08:26 PM, Fero Kiraly wrote: > Because of Hans (thanks Hans) suggestion I did a NO SVN pkgbild. > It should be the REAL latest version of pd-extended 0.43-x > here: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44798 > > it was born from: > https://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/branches/pd-extended/0.43 > ------- the latest pd-extended 0.43.x > git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem > ------- the latest GEM > git://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pure-data/pd-extended.git > ------- the latest pd-extended core > + mime types (it depends now on hicolor-icon-theme) > > or am I wrong about the latest sources ?? > > I have a question again. On aur.archlinux.org it is shown as Pure Data > Extended 0.43-1 version, BUT IT IS 0.43-4 NOW. Where I did mistake in > PKGBUILD ? > cheers > > paum > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
