For those who want Gem from git, why not make a separate package? Also, it should be easy to package lots of libraries individually for anyone who wants to use Pd-vanilla in arch with libs.
.hc On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Fero Kiraly wrote: > Thanks to Hans suggestions I made a research why I cant compile pd-ex from > branch. > It takes me some time but I found that was something wrong in GEM > configure.ac script. So I did it ! > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44798 > > ---> should be the correct build package script for the latest pd-extended > It is made from: > > https://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/branches/pd-extended/0.43 > > + > > git://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pure-data/pd-extended.git > > > {I apologize all the guys who liked pd-extended with the latest GEM, but (I > understand this) it is 'official' package of pd-ex, now.} > > > > > fero > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
