----- Original Message -----
> From: Frank Barknecht <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 12:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming
> ...)
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:26:17AM -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> How many table names total were there in the patch that was overloading
>> the device?
>
> I don't remember anymore, that was in 2009, when the abstraction was first
> posted here on pd-list.
>
> But if you don't believe me, just do some benchmarks on your own and compare
> array access with list filtering.
It makes no difference if the number of table names is around 100. At 1000 your
method is certainly faster-- I've just never had a patch with 1000 tables.
-Jonathan
>
> Ciao
> --
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
