----- Original Message -----
> From: Cyrille Henry <[email protected]>
> To: Frank Barknecht <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 1:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming
> ...)
>
> hello,
>
> yes, list are very slow.
>
> by example, pmpd* object have messages to output list, in order to "list
> prepend 0" - "list trim" - "send table-foo"
[list trim] is superfluous in this example.
> we add few years ago messages to allow direct writing to table.
>
> using list size > 100 or 1000 gives incredible speed difference.
>
> cheers
> Cyrille
>
>
> Le 05/11/2012 18:29, Frank Barknecht a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:26:17AM -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>>> How many table names total were there in the patch that was overloading
>>> the device?
>>
>> I don't remember anymore, that was in 2009, when the abstraction was
> first
>> posted here on pd-list.
>>
>> But if you don't believe me, just do some benchmarks on your own and
> compare
>> array access with list filtering.
>>
>> Ciao
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
