Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all them controlled by the same number box?
.hc On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <[email protected]> wrote: > What are you trying to accomplish? > > On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <[email protected]> wrote: > How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a > [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly > speaking). So > > [phasor~ 1] > | > [rate~ 1.5] > > will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't do the > trick with non-integers. > Any ideas? > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
