Don't think I really follow. Each [rate~] actually outputs a [phasor~] with a different frequency (different frequency ratio), all driven by the same [phasor~]. How can you send a value from one number box to all [phasor~]s?
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]>wrote: > > Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all > them controlled by the same number box? > > .hc > > On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > > copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What are you trying to accomplish? >> On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a >>> [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly >>> speaking). So >>> >>> [phasor~ 1] >>> | >>> [rate~ 1.5] >>> >>> will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't >>> do the trick with non-integers. >>> Any ideas? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
