On 01/01/13 21:46, Mike McGonagle wrote:
Ideally, I would think that [throw~] could be extended (into a new object? [mthrow~] for multi-throw?). This object would also allow for these signals to be scaled independently for each destination added.
Multiple [throw~] can sum to corresponding [catch~] Multiple [receive~]/[r~] can receive from corresponding [send~]/[s~] Something like this might work: | | [throw~ a] [throw~ a] ... [catch~ a] | [send~ b] [receive~ b] [receive~ b] ... | | I haven't tested but it might even be fine to use the same name for both. Claude -- http://mathr.co.uk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
