On 01/02/2013 04:24 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
On 01/01/13 21:46, Mike McGonagle wrote:
Ideally, I would think that [throw~] could be extended (into a new
object? [mthrow~] for multi-throw?). This object would also allow for
these signals to be scaled independently for each destination added.
Multiple [throw~] can sum to corresponding [catch~]
Multiple [receive~]/[r~] can receive from corresponding [send~]/[s~]
Something like this might work:
| |
[throw~ a] [throw~ a] ...
[catch~ a]
|
[send~ b]
[receive~ b] [receive~ b] ...
| |
I haven't tested but it might even be fine to use the same name for both.
yes.
we've been using this idiom quite a lot.
[catchsend~ foo] == [catch~ $1]->[send $1]
gfmadsr
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
