----- Original Message -----
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]>
> To: Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?
>
> On 01/19/2013 02:14 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 1:33 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?
>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't heard any objections to including them. I agree, they are
> nice
>>> features. It is just a matter of someone doing the work of porting
> those
>>> changes to Pd-extended.
>>
>> So you would be ok with adding a field to the widgetbehavior struct
>> (or whatever its called)? Doesn't that break binary compatability?
>>
>> I think many of his gui speedups are based off that.
>
> Breaking binary compatibility is not something to do lightly. It creates lot
> of other headaches. Plus I don't think its necessary to speed up the GUI, I
> think there are better approaches.
How do you change text_displace to send a single
message to the gui to just "move everything that is currently selected" rather
than sending a separate message for every selected t_text?
-Jonathan
>
> .hc
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
