On 01/19/2013 09:39 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> >> To: Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:22 PM >> Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ? >> >> On 01/19/2013 02:14 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 1:33 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ? >>>> >>>> >>>> I haven't heard any objections to including them. I agree, they are >> nice >>>> features. It is just a matter of someone doing the work of porting >> those >>>> changes to Pd-extended. >>> >>> So you would be ok with adding a field to the widgetbehavior struct >>> (or whatever its called)? Doesn't that break binary compatability? >>> >>> I think many of his gui speedups are based off that. >> >> Breaking binary compatibility is not something to do lightly. It creates lot >> of other headaches. Plus I don't think its necessary to speed up the GUI, I >> think there are better approaches. > > How do you change text_displace to send a single > message to the gui to just "move everything that is currently selected" rather > than sending a separate message for every selected t_text?
I think you take it a step further and keep pd out of the moving process all together. pd-gui should handle moves entirely, and then just report it to pd once its complete. .hc _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
