----- Original Message -----
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic <[email protected]>
> To: 'Jonathan Wilkes' <[email protected]>; 'Hans-Christoph Steiner'
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 11:21 PM
> Subject: RE: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?
>
>> > Why not simply use pd-l2ork?
>>
>> I do, but possible reasons why someone might not use Pd-l2ork:
>> * no binary for windows
>> * no binary for OSX
>
> On the flip-side pd-l2ork provides a solid, bug-free environment on Linux
> and looks a lot more contemporary than the aged default tk iteration. In
> other words, it is a targeted Linux distribution of pd (something that can
> be easily lost in a cross-platform effort with inadequate developer support,
> as I am sure Hans can attest to). At this point I would go as far as
> challenge you to find something that does not work or exhibits a buggy
> behavior
$@ in msg box probably still crashes when incoming args > 1000 (same with
pd-extended)
-Jonathan
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
