-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-04-23 11:50, Joe White wrote: > Out of curiosity, are the workarounds suggested more of a result of > the difficulty of extending the Pd core rather than the > implications that such a change might have?
the implementation would be trivial (merely removing the safeguards that currently clamp the value to 0) fgmasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlF2YIEACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQyoQCgiC95SRoOKaOHu6qkmpX+kD80 /ugAoJymAbmtt6qWkZM5rAlObyhdarRF =KUIu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
