For the time being build them independently by hand after installing pd-l2ork. Also, if you recommend inclusion of specific libs and/or objects, we can put it on the todo list for vetting to see if they are stable enough to be included as-is and/or purpose a set of fixes before they can be included.
Best wishes, Ico On Jun 23, 2013 2:16 PM, "András Murányi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [...] >> BTW, just did -F build here and it builds everything just fine. This >> suggests something may be off with your setup. Can you try installing >> whatever you've built and then trying to build from source again? If this >> succeeds that means that something in the build script fails to find >> relevant includes. Please send me your build log off-list so that I can >> investigate further. >> >> > So I've just made a build with ./tar_em_up.sh without touching the > sources, and it built fine and produced binaries for everything including > those marked in LIB_TARGETS in externals/Makefile. Everything also > installed fine by "make install". > In contrast, my previous attempt, where I added some elements to > LIB_TARGETS manually, produced a lot less binaries. It seems that messing > up with LIB_TARGETS in l2ork can have a negative impact on "innocent" libs > too, at the moment. > If I still have a question question after this, it's: what's the > recommended way to add non-default libs to build with pd-l2ork? > > Thanks, > > András >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
