On 09/08/13 19:42, Miller Puckette wrote:
> There still could be situations where an abstraction has a sub-patch ("pd foo"
> for instance) - I'm not clear as to whether those namings should be supressed
> as well. It seems like a tricky problem - lots of people seem to use
> abstractions with only one instance and might be depending on the bindings.
Maybe the best fix would be to make pd_unbind() constant time (perhaps
by storing bindings in a doubly-linked list instead of a singly-linked
list) and be done with it, instead of hacking workarounds..
Claude
--
http://mathr.co.uk
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
