Oh I see. So it's to do with the size of the array. Thanks for that. Now, is there a workaround, other than reading the file directly from the disk?
Best, Peiman *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> || Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>* On 29 October 2013 12:56, Claude Heiland-Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29/10/13 12:36, peiman khosravi wrote: > >> An >> artefact of the sample interpolation perhaps? >> > > No, of limited precision in the index: > > http://lists.puredata.info/**pipermail/pd-list/2012-07/**097073.html<http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-07/097073.html> > > > Claude > -- > http://mathr.co.uk > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** > listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
