I was thinking it might be related to your file's 24-bit sample encoding and was going to suggest soundfiler's "raw" message to be specific about that. But if you're getting perfect results with vline~ and not phasor~, it sounds like that's not the issue. Are you using the 64-bit Pd for OSX?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:26 PM, peiman khosravi <peimankhosr...@gmail.com>wrote: > But it doesn't end there. It's also an issue with phasor~. At the right > sampling rate, it works with vline~ but not with phasor. As in phasor > introduces those noises. > > > > > *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS > Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> || > Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>* > > > On 29 October 2013 19:13, peiman khosravi <peimankhosr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I think I have it figured out. Problem was inconsistency between the PD >> sample rate and the soundfile's sample rate. Not sure how that works but it >> seems to add some sort of ring modulation to the result. >> >> P >> >> >> >> >> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS >> Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> || >> Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>* >> >> >> On 29 October 2013 17:50, peiman khosravi <peimankhosr...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Also, even with the array max size of 2^24 I'm still getting the noise. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS >>> Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> || >>> Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>* >>> >>> >>> On 29 October 2013 16:50, peiman khosravi <peimankhosr...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Oh I see. So it's to do with the size of the array. Thanks for that. >>>> >>>> Now, is there a workaround, other than reading the file directly from >>>> the disk? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Peiman >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS >>>> Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> || >>>> Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>* >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29 October 2013 12:56, Claude Heiland-Allen <cla...@mathr.co.uk>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 29/10/13 12:36, peiman khosravi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> An >>>>>> artefact of the sample interpolation perhaps? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, of limited precision in the index: >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/**pipermail/pd-list/2012-07/**097073.html<http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-07/097073.html> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Claude >>>>> -- >>>>> http://mathr.co.uk >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** >>>>> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- William Brent www.williambrent.com “Great minds flock together” Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century www.conflations.com
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list