On 10/07/2014 08:51 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > I attached the patch. thanks. for the future, it would be welcome if you only attached the pd-patch. the png does not add any additional information, might not show the actual problem and is (in the specific case) about 80 times bigger than the pd-patch.
> I understand what is the problem, but I don't have > the real solution for this. I want to know how to prevent this situation. > my ascii-art patch should have given you the clue: >>> >>> >>> | >>> | +------+ >>> [f] | >>> | | >>> [+ 1] | >>> | | >>> [% 6] | >>> | | >>> [t f f] | >>> | +--+ >>> | >>> #0 use trigger whenever you want to connect a single outlet to multiple inlets (this is general advice, and is not related to your *current* problem) #1 keep the [% 6] in the loop. it will make sure that the number that is incremented will never get into the problematic range (even if you force it to a too-high value (e.g. by sending a large number directly into the counter) it will bring the values down to an operable range and thus "magically" fix the problem in the next iteration. gfmasdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
