Thanks for the advice and your time, IOhannes. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:17 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 08:51 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > > I attached the patch. > > thanks. > for the future, it would be welcome if you only attached the pd-patch. > the png does not add any additional information, might not show the > actual problem and is (in the specific case) about 80 times bigger than > the pd-patch. > > > > I understand what is the problem, but I don't have > > the real solution for this. I want to know how to prevent this situation. > > > > my ascii-art patch should have given you the clue: > > >>> > >>> > >>> | > >>> | +------+ > >>> [f] | > >>> | | > >>> [+ 1] | > >>> | | > >>> [% 6] | > >>> | | > >>> [t f f] | > >>> | +--+ > >>> | > >>> > > #0 use trigger whenever you want to connect a single outlet to multiple > inlets (this is general advice, and is not related to your *current* > problem) > > #1 keep the [% 6] in the loop. it will make sure that the number that is > incremented will never get into the problematic range (even if you force > it to a too-high value (e.g. by sending a large number directly into the > counter) it will bring the values down to an operable range and thus > "magically" fix the problem in the next iteration. > > > gfmasdr > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
