> compatibility also means keeping (functionality) bugs. Yes it does! But, anyway, the point is that I do not really see a "bug" here...
2015-06-20 15:51 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]>: > On 06/20/2015 03:55 AM, Joel Matthys wrote: > > I just don't see the value of trying to make it compatible with broken > > code in Max. > > the sole purpose of cyclone is to provide compatibility with max: if you > have a max(<5) patch, it makes it trivial to port it to Pd. > > compatibility also means keeping (functionality) bugs. > > if you don't care about compatibility, there are plenty of other > externals out there, that might fit your bill. > > > gfdsamr > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
