hello, I had plans to try working on a .c code for it, and my idea was to just adapt from [comb~].
Yeah... Teeth is almost identical to [comb~]! In [comb~] you have the same delay time for the feedforward and the feedback. In [teeth~] you can specify different time delays for feedforward and feedback. So you basically have only one extra time delay parameter to include in [comb~] and... voilà, you've got [teeth~]! Hope this makes it clear for you. Cheers 2015-06-23 4:56 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan <[email protected]>: > Hi Alexandre, > > Just now I completed the c code for a teeth~ object, which doesn't seem > to crash instantly and sounds* the same as your abstraction which is now > in cyclone. > > The block diagram in your help patch made it very clear what should be > coded. The only thing (what an expert told me), was that 'z' applies to > samples, and teeth~ is controlled in milli-seconds. > > While coding, I found the delay time has to be zero or positive, but the > gain coefficients can be negative too, adding the delayed signal out of > phase. > > I have no plans to add the object to cyclone anytime soon. First spend > some time figuring out that i really does what I think it does. It > doesn't crash instantly, and output looks sinusoid with a sinus input, > but that doesn't prove much. And at least some form of interpolation > should be added before it is ready for prime time. > > Greetings, > > Fred Jan > > *) the help patch sounds equally weird with both, using only the > positive gains > > On 2015-06-15 04:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > it's just a preview, I'm gonna still work on them and help files :) > > > > 2015-06-15 10:38 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > > Hi Alexandre, > > > > Thanks for the abstractions. I will include them in the svn > repository > > and the next binary deken compatible builds. Only rect~ didn't work. > > > > I applied some minor modification by replacing [pi], which doesn't > > appear to be vanilla by [3.141593(. > > > > Greetings, > > > > Fred Jan > > > > P.S. Wouldn't mind if the future supplied help-patches were already > > cyclone-standard formatting ;-). > > > > On 2015-06-14 10:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > >> Any object or abstraction that implements something > > >> present in Max(5) could be part of cyclone. > > > > > > i've made 13 abstractions so far > > > > > > - atodb > > > - atodb~ > > > - dbtoa > > > - dbtoa~ > > > - freqshift~ > > > - rect~ > > > - saw~ > > > - scale > > > - scale~ > > > - teeth~ > > > - thresh~ > > > - tri~ > > > - trunc~ > > > > > > Gonna try and do a few of these more, I have more 5 in mind so > far. I > > > guess some make much more sense as objects, like > > [rect~]/[tri~]/[saw~]. > > > Here's a preview attached. > > > > > > cheers > > > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
